Announcements

Job offersmore »

Tweeting Growers

Last commentsmore »

Top 5 - yesterday

  • No news has been published yesterday.

Top 5 - last week

Top 5 - last month

Exchange ratesmore »




In-house sampling methods to monitor the growing media

Some of the most common problems in container production are associated with inadequate pH and EC levels in the growing media. Fortunately, many problems can be prevented by monitoring the growing media. Four in-house sampling methods are available to monitor pH and EC of container-grown plants in greenhouses:  Saturated media extract (SME), 1:2 Method, Squeeze Method and Pour-Thru.



Saturated media extract is the method commonly used in horticultural commercial labs. It is recommended for new batches of growing media, when sub-irrigating and for containers of any size. It can also be used for plugs, by collecting multiple samples. The downside of SME is that it is a destructive sampling method. The 1:2 method applications are similar to SME. However, the SME method is preferred over the 1:2 method because it is not affected by moisture variability or exact volume of the sample.

Pour-thru method is an excellent alternative to quickly monitor changes overtime. It is highly recommended for container production where it is possible to collect leachate and when using controlled release fertilizers. Plants irrigated with ebb-and-flood benches or flood floors tend to accumulate high level of salts on the top layer of the growing media. The pour-thru method may displace the salts to the bottom of the container and leach to the sample, providing inaccurate results. Therefore, avoid using pour-thru when sub-irrigating. Instead use SME or 1:2.

Plug squeeze is used for plugs or bedding plant flats.

Keep in mind that the reference numbers vary by method. For more information on interpretation of results go to: https://ag.umass.edu/greenhouse-floriculture/fact-sheets/current-methods-of-greenhouse-media-testing-how-they-differ

Sample analysis cannot be better than the quality of the sample. Consistency on how, when and who collects the samples is essential to track changes in the growing media over time.

Source: e-Gro

Publication date: 2/7/2017

 


 

Other news in this sector:

5/25/2017 "More and more applications for coco substrate"
3/23/2017 Different types of limestone to increase substrate pH
3/20/2017 Forteco corporate identity revamped
2/21/2017 Testing and corrective procedures for low substrate pH
1/19/2017 Hardy Export expanding markets in China
1/17/2017 "Adding hydrogel to growing media improves crop, bottom line"
12/22/2016 From Kilimanjaro to Perligran
12/19/2016 Grow-Tech patents tissue culture plug
11/21/2016 UK: Drive to encourage youngsters into the horticultural industry
10/24/2016 UK: Developing new blends of growing media for horticulture
10/19/2016 Establishing growing substrate pH with compost and limestone
9/9/2016 What impacts the pH of your growing medium: water pH or water alkalinity?
8/30/2016 Predicting plant-soil feedbacks from plant traits
7/22/2016 Oasis introduces plugs with friendly bonding technology
7/22/2016 Growing kalanchoe in peat-free substrates
7/5/2016 "Excellent growth in Dutch Plantin growbags here in Turkey"
7/4/2016 “Water never spreads equally in the pot ball”
6/22/2016 UK: Growing media responsible sourcing scheme to launch
5/30/2016 Rock wool added to RHP quality mark
5/30/2016 "Fast transition from vegetative to generative growth"

 

Leave a comment: (max. 500 characters)

  1. All comments which are not related to the article contents will be removed.
  2. All comments with non-related commercial content, will be removed.
  3. All comments with offensive language, will be removed.




  Display email address

  new code