The pH of peatmoss generally ranges from 3.0 to 4.0 and limestone is typically added to raise pH to a suitable range. Compost is also used as a substrate component and typically has a high pH of 6.0 to 8.0. When using compost, lime rates must be reduced or eliminated.
The two objectives of this study were to determine the resulting pH of substrates created with varying amounts of limestone and compost and assess the impact of the various amounts of limestone and compost on pH buffering capacity. Compost was created from a 1:1:1 weight ratio of a mixture of green plant material and restaurant food waste:horse manure:wood chips.
The first experiment was a factorial design with five compost rates (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% by volume), four limestone rates (0, 1.2, 2.4, and 3.6 g·L−1 substrate) with five replications. The experiment was conducted three times, each with a different batch of compost.
With 0 lime, initial substrate pH increased from 4.5 to 6.7 as compost rate increased. This trend occurred at all other lime rates, which had pH ranges of 5.2–6.9, 5.6–7.0, and 6.1–7.1 for rates of 1.2, 2.4, and 3.6 g·L−1 substrate, respectively. Substrate pH increased significantly as either compost or lime rates increased.
The second experiment was a factorial design with four compost rates by volume (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%), the same four limestone rates as Expt. 1, and five replications. Each substrate treatment was titrated through incubations with six sulfuric acid rates (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.7 mol of H+ per gram of dry substrate).
Substrates with a similar initial pH had very similar buffering capacities regardless of the compost or limestone rate. These results indicate compost can be used to establish growing substrate pH similar to limestone, and this change will have little to no effect on pH buffering capacity.
Click here to access the study.
Announcements
Job Offers
- Head Grower Greenhouse Canada
- Post Entry Quarantine Facility Manager
- Economic Policy Officer Agri-Tech Kentucky
- Licensing Manager North America
- Junior Sales Executive
- Fruit Breeder/Trait Discovery Scientist
- General Manager
- Regional Sales Manager – DACH Region
- Country Manager – Italy
- Country Manager – Spain
"Tweeting Growers"
Top 5 -yesterday
Top 5 -last week
Top 5 -last month
Receive the daily newsletter in your email for free | Click here
Other news in this sector:
- 2023-01-05 Navigating through substrate shortages
- 2022-12-13 "The roses were ready to harvest after 6 months and produced an average of 10 stems per plant"
- 2022-12-07 Towards peat-free potting soil and substrate
- 2022-12-05 The DCM aktiv-erden potting soil assortment in Bio-quality
- 2022-11-28 Growing with a wire: Karma Plants
- 2022-11-24 Agriculture resource dive: peat
- 2022-11-23 Coco substrate: a sustainable choice
- 2022-11-17 3-in-1 sensor to simultaneously monitor soil-based production
- 2022-11-11 Ireland: Addressing the challenges related to peat supply in horticulture
- 2022-11-08 Ireland: Kitty and Colm explore the world of horticulture
- 2022-11-07 Posidonia-based compost growing media improve tolerance and nutrient uptake in ornamental plants
- 2022-11-01 Why should I shelter my substrate stock from wind and rain?
- 2022-10-31 Calcitic vs dolomitic limestone: similarities and differences
- 2022-10-31 Webinar: root zone management for the best results
- 2022-10-21 New £1million RHS research project to accelerate horticulture’s transition to peat-free
- 2022-10-14 HTA puts forward industry views and briefs members on peat ban
- 2022-10-13 Ireland: Shiploads of peat being imported for growers
- 2022-10-13 HTA's OMC discuss peat-free growing media and the cost of energy
- 2022-10-06 Peat-free Jiffy Substrates trialed by tree nursery
- 2022-10-04 How lightweight expanded clay comes in beneficial
