Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Chrysanthemum can do with less "end of the day" far-red light

In recent years, interest in LED lighting among chrysanthemum growers has increased considerably. When choosing the LED lighting system, it is important to make a good choice with regard to the efficiency of the lamps and the right spectrum for the crop. When growing under full-LED, growers fear that the branches might remain too short in winter. Therefore, we are looking for possibilities to control the elongation of chrysanthemums with a light spectrum.

Research conducted by the business unit Greenhouse Horticulture of Wageningen University & Research in 2021 showed that stem length under full-LED can be controlled very well by “end of the day” far-red light of 20 μmol/m²/s far-red light for 30 minutes. In addition to longer flower stems, cultivation was accelerated by a few days. The question now is whether the same effect can be achieved with lower intensity or a shorter period of “end of the day” far-red light. Other questions addressed in this study are whether the “end of the day” far-red light is needed throughout the entire cultivation and whether extra far-red light during the day at the start of the crop improves the root growth of the cuttings.

To answer these questions, the cultivation of four chrysanthemum varieties (Magnum, Baltica, Chic, and Pina colada) under 200 μmol/m²/s full LED in the Innovation and Demonstration Centre LED lighting (IDC LED) started in May 2022. “End of the day” far-red light duration was reduced from 30 to 20 and 10 minutes (20 mol/m²/s), and the intensity of the far-red light was reduced to 10 and 5 mol/m²/s (for 30 minutes). In addition, in the base spectrum, the percentages of green and far-red light were varied, and cultivation was carried out at a lower light intensity (100 μmol/m²/s) to reduce the energy consumption of illuminated chrysanthemum cultivation.

Per variety, per treatment, flower stems were harvested if they had at least five open flowers (Chic, Pina colada, and Baltica) or if the flower had opened sufficiently (Magnum). “End of the day” far-red light (30 minutes 20 mol/m²/s) resulted in longer flower stems compared to no “end of the day” far-red. Comparable effects were obtained if the “end of the day” period of far red was reduced to 20 or 10 minutes, as well as when the intensity was reduced to 10 or 5 µmol/m2/s. These results can be considered in choosing a lighting installation. Post-irradiation with far-red light further shortens the cultivation cycle by approximately two days but has little effect on stem weight, although visual inspection of the root systems of young plants (2 weeks after planting) showed that “end of the day” lighting with far-red resulted in more root growth at the start of cultivation.

When “end of the day” far-red light is given, the effect on elongation is already visible within two weeks. The question was, therefore, whether it is possible to provide the “end of the day” far-red light only during the first two weeks of cultivation. This turns out not to be the case: when the “end of the day” far-red light is switched off after two weeks, the effect on elongation disappears, and the flower branches at harvest are as long as the treatment without the “end of the day” far-red light.

These results were obtained at a light spectrum of 5% blue light, 5% green light, and 90% red light. When the proportion of green light is reduced to 0% or increased to 15% at the expense of red light, this appears to have virtually no effect on stem length, growth duration, or shoot weight.

Reducing the light intensity does have major effects on growth duration and shoot weight. When illuminated with 100 µmol/m2/s instead of 200 µmol/m2/s, the shoot weight is only about 2/3 of the shoot weight at 200 µmol/m2/s. The reduction of the light intensity does not affect the elongation of the flower stems, but it does lead to a delay in cultivation. In these treatments, the flowers were harvested about five days later than under high light.

These results show that chrysanthemum flowers can be grown under full LED very well and that there are sufficient possibilities with light colors to control the crop in such a way that high-quality flowers can be produced.

This research is funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, and Greenhouse Horticulture in the Netherlands within the program Greenhouse as an Energy Source, with a contribution to the lamps and their control by Signify.

For more information:
Wageningen University & Research
www.wur.nl

 

Publication date: